Abstract

Background The remarkable similarity of animal embryos at particular stages of development led to the proposal of a developmental hourglass. In this model, early events in development are less conserved across species but lead to a highly conserved ‘phylotypic period’. Beyond this stage, the model suggests that development once again becomes less conserved, leading to the diversity of forms. Recent comparative studies of gene expression in animal groups have provided strong support for the hourglass model. How and why might such an hourglass pattern be generated? More importantly, how might early acting events in development evolve while still maintaining a later conserved stage?Scope The discovery that an hourglass pattern may also exist in the embryogenesis of plants provides comparative data that may help us explain this phenomenon. Whether the developmental hourglass occurs in plants, and what this means for our understanding of embryogenesis in plants and animals is discussed. Models by which conserved early-acting genes might change their functional role in the evolution of gene networks, how networks buffer these changes, and how that might constrain, or confer diversity, of the body plan are also discused.Conclusions Evidence of a morphological and molecular hourglass in plant and animal embryogenesis suggests convergent evolution. This convergence is likely due to developmental constraints imposed upon embryogenesis by the need to produce a viable embryo with an established body plan, controlled by the architecture of the underlying gene regulatory networks. As the body plan is largely laid down during the middle phases of embryo development in plants and animals, then it is perhaps not surprising this stage represents the narrow waist of the hourglass where the gene regulatory networks are the oldest and most robust and integrated, limiting species diversity and constraining morphological space.

Highlights

  • The remarkable similarity of animal embryos at particular stages of development led to the proposal of a developmental hourglass

  • Producing multicellular offspring through embryogenesis enables the basic body plan to be established, while nutrition and protection provided by the mother increase the chance of survival

  • In the case of the developmental hourglass model, where early events in development are less conserved across species, but lead to a highly conserved ‘phylotypic period’ during midembryogenesis before again diverging, how do early-acting events in development evolve whilst providing the scaffold on which all of embryogenesis is built? Here we compare morphological and molecular processes that occur during plant and animal embryogenesis, suggesting that these independently evolved processes both show an hourglass pattern, to draw out general processes that may lead to hourglass models

Read more

Summary

Background

The remarkable similarity of animal embryos at particular stages of development led to the proposal of a developmental hourglass In this model, early events in development are less conserved across species but lead to a highly conserved ‘phylotypic period’. Conclusions Evidence of a morphological and molecular hourglass in plant and animal embryogenesis suggests convergent evolution This convergence is likely due to developmental constraints imposed upon embryogenesis by the need to produce a viable embryo with an established body plan, controlled by the architecture of the underlying gene regulatory networks. We compare morphological and molecular processes that occur during plant and animal embryogenesis, suggesting that these independently evolved processes both show an hourglass pattern, to draw out general processes that may lead to hourglass models In the case of the developmental hourglass model, where early events in development are less conserved across species, but lead to a highly conserved ‘phylotypic period’ during midembryogenesis before again diverging, how do early-acting events in development evolve whilst providing the scaffold on which all of embryogenesis is built? Here we compare morphological and molecular processes that occur during plant and animal embryogenesis, suggesting that these independently evolved processes both show an hourglass pattern, to draw out general processes that may lead to hourglass models

THE HOURGLASS MODEL OF EMBRYOGENESIS IN ANIMALIA
IN ANGIOSPERMAE
Is there a morphological hourglass in flowering plant embryogenesis?
Asterad Solanad Chenopodiad Caryophyllad Piperad
Constraints in early embryo development
Constraints in late embryo development
Developmental robustness and hourglasses
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
LITERATURE CITED
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call