Abstract

A general relationship between the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content of all plant organs (e.g. leaf, stem, and root) is hypothesized to exist according to whole-plant economics spectrum (PES) theory, but the evidence supporting these expected patterns remains scarce. We measured the N and P content of the leaves, twigs and fine roots of 64 species in three different forest communities along an elevational gradient (evergreen broad-leaved forest, 1319 m a.s.l., coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, 1697 m a.s.l., and deciduous forest, 1818 m a.s.l.) in the Wuyishan National Nature Reserve, southeastern China. The scaling relationship between the N and P content and the linear regression relationship between the N:P ratio and N and P content were analysed. The leaf N and P content was significantly higher at the high-elevation site than at the low- or middle-elevation sites (P < 0.001). The N and P content followed a power-law relationship with similar scaling slopes between organs. The N (common slope, 1.13) and P (common slope, 1.03) content isometrically covaried among leaves, twigs and roots. The scaling exponents of the N–P relationship were not significantly different from 1.0 in all organs, with a common slope of 1.08. The scaling constants of N–P decreased significantly (P < 0.05) from the highest value in fine roots (β = 1.25), followed by leaves (β = 1.17), to the lowest value in twigs (β = 0.88). Standardized major axis (SMA) analyses and comparisons of 95 % confidence intervals also showed that the numerical values of the scaling slopes and the scaling constants did not differ regardless of elevation. The N content, but not the P content, accounted for a large proportion of the variation in the N:P ratio in leaves (N:P and N: r2 = 0.31, F = 33.36, P < 0.001) and fine roots (N:P and N: r2 = 0.15, F = 10.65, P < 0.05). In contrast, the N:P ratio was significantly related to both the N and P content in the twigs (N:P and N: r2 = 0.20, F = 17.86, P < 0.001; N:P and P: r2 = 0.34, F = 35.03, P < 0.001, respectively). Our results indicate that different organs of subtropical woody plants share a similar isometric scaling relationship between their N and P content, providing partial support for the PES hypothesis. Moreover, the effects of the N and P content on the N:P ratio differ between metabolic organs (leaves and fine roots) and structural organs (twigs), elucidating the stoichiometric regulatory mechanism of different organs.

Highlights

  • Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are essential nutrients that influence many plant functions, such as growth, reproduction and defence (Li et al 2010; Crous et al 2017)

  • Our results indicate that different organs of subtropical woody plants share a similar isometric scaling relationship between their N and P content, providing partial support for the plant economics spectrum (PES) hypothesis

  • The N and P content in the different organs of a plant reflect nutrient uptake and utilization efficiency during plant growth (Wright and Westoby 2003), while the N–P relationship in tissues can aid in identifying the flows of energy and element cycling across plants, which can advance our understanding of ecological dynamics and processes (Reich et al 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are essential nutrients that influence many plant functions, such as growth, reproduction and defence (Li et al 2010; Crous et al 2017). The N and P content in the different organs of a plant reflect nutrient uptake and utilization efficiency during plant growth (Wright and Westoby 2003), while the N–P relationship in tissues can aid in identifying the flows of energy and element cycling across plants, which can advance our understanding of ecological dynamics and processes (Reich et al 2010). As both elements are important for plant metabolism, the relationship between N and P among different plants or environments is of particular interest (Reich et al 2010). Tian et al (2017) revealed large variations in the leaf N and P scaling slopes, which decreased from tropical to temperate to boreal zones

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.