Abstract

This research investigates the corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting for banking industry in Nordic countries and China, and compares the convergence and disparity of disclosed CSR information across these two regimes. The study encompasses a sample of eight largest commercial banks by total assets in Nordic countries and China over a 5-year period of 2013–2017. We employ a disclosure index approach to assess the contents of CSR reporting based on eight categories and a total of 60 CSR indicators. The results indicate that Nordic banks have a higher overall disclosure level of CSR information than Chinese banks, and significantly ahead of their counterparts with respect to the international commitment, and a wider coverage of addressing stakeholders’ needs. In contrast, CSR reporting in Chinese banks put greater emphasis on national public policy and philanthropic activities. Nevertheless, all sample countries share a convergence on underlining the importance of complying with applicable laws and regulations. The study findings assert that the convergence and disparity of CSR reporting across countries is relevant to pre-existing socio-political institutions the firms can rely on. This research probes into an unexplored research territory by comparing the CSR reporting between banks from a so-called Nordic business-society model and a Confucian-tradition model. Hence, it entails some important policy prescriptions for the concerned administrators and corporate practitioners in the sample countries.

Highlights

  • Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has picked up momentum as a critical issue for many companies given the increasing public awareness of the influence of corporate activities on the environment and society (Amran et al, 2017)

  • By evaluating CSR reporting for each eight largest banks over the period of 2013–2017, we aim to investigate the convergence and disparity of disclosed CSR information across China and Nordic countries including Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland

  • The time period of 2013–2017 was used to assess whether CSR reporting of banks in Nordic countries and China changed over the years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has picked up momentum as a critical issue for many companies given the increasing public awareness of the influence of corporate activities on the environment and society (Amran et al, 2017). Companies are expected to act in a socially responsible manner and be financially accountable (Hackston & Milne, 1996). To obtain this “social license,” CSR reports are disseminated to communicate an enterprise’s achievement in striking a balance between financial goals and non-financial sustainability undertakings (Gunningham et al, 2004). Considering the widespread importance of CSR disclosures, 78% of the 250 largest companies in the Fortune Global 500 included CSR information in their annual financial reports in 2017. The trend for large companies to issue separate CSR reports continued to grow globally as 75% for the 100 largest companies in 43 counties published CSR reports in 2017, while only 41% of them had issued such reports in 2005 (KPMG, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call