Abstract
Recently the feasibility of modern CAD/CAM workflows were described to manufacture insertion guides and metal printed appliances to improve the possibilities of palatal TAD anchorage. Both conventional and digital workflows are safe and efficacious and broaden the treatment options significantly. Advantages of digital workflow are that TADs and appliance can be inserted in just one appointment, more rigid appliances can be designed and a higher precision can be obtained due to the use of scanners. Disadvantages of the new digital workflow may be higher cost and more time that is needed for the incorporation of digital workflows and design of the appliances. Additionally, there is always need for a laboratory process, whilst some conventional TAD appliances can be bend and adapted directly chairside. Metal printed appliances are very rigid and not flexible and thus cannot be activated or bent easily, which may also be considered as a disadvantage compared to conventional TAD borne sliders.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
