Conventional Therapies Do Not Prolong the Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Extrahepatic Metastases under Receiving of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Abstract

Simple SummaryTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including sorafenib and lenvatinib, have been the current standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cases where an immune checkpoint inhibitor cannot be used. The SHARP study showed that sorafenib tended to be less effective for extrahepatic metastases than for vascular invasion. Moreover, lenvatinib showed a response similar to that of sorafenib in such patients. The aforementioned data suggested that the addition of conventional therapies, including chemoembolization and radiation therapy, may improve the prognosis of such patients. Our retrospective study found that TKI promoted a longer overall survival in patients with extrahepatic metastases compared to conventional therapies. TKI plus conventional therapies did not promote a better prognosis compared to TKI alone. Thus, conventional therapies can be an option when events that worsen the quality of life occur in HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases.Background: Conventional therapies, including chemoembolization and radiation therapy, have been expected to prolong the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastases, which remains poor. However, little information is available on the efficacy of conventional therapies for such patients under tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 127 HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases, who were divided into the non-TKI (conventional therapies) and TKI groups and further subdivided into the TKI alone and TKI plus conventional therapies groups. Conventional therapies included transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and UFT, an oral chemotherapeutic agent. Results: The median of the overall survival (OS) of the 127 patients with extrahepatic metastases was 7.0 months. Meanwhile, the median OS of the TKI and non-TKI groups was 12.1 and 4.1 months, respectively. Imitating TKI after diagnosing metastases promoted a favorable increase in OS. Among the TKI group, the median OS in the TKI alone group was 8.9 months. TKI plus conventional therapies promoted no improvement in OS after adjusting for the patients’ background data. Conclusion: TKI promoted a better OS in HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases compared to conventional therapies. However, TKI plus conventional therapies promoted no improvement in the prognosis of such patients.