Conventional rigid 2D substrates cause complex contractile signals in monolayers of human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes

Abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC‐CM) in monolayers interact mechanically via cell–cell and cell–substrate adhesion. Spatiotemporal features of contraction were analysed in hiPSC‐CM monolayers (1) attached to glass or plastic (Young's modulus (E) >1 GPa), (2) detached (substrate‐free) and (3) attached to a flexible collagen hydrogel (E = 22 kPa). The effects of isoprenaline on contraction were compared between rigid and flexible substrates. To clarify the underlying mechanisms, further gene expression and computational studies were performed. HiPSC‐CM monolayers exhibited multiphasic contractile profiles on rigid surfaces in contrast to hydrogels, substrate‐free cultures or single cells where only simple twitch‐like time‐courses were observed. Isoprenaline did not change the contraction profile on either surface, but its lusitropic and chronotropic effects were greater in hydrogel compared with glass. There was no significant difference between stiff and flexible substrates in regard to expression of the stress‐activated genes NPPA and NPPB. A computational model of cell clusters demonstrated similar complex contractile interactions on stiff substrates as a consequence of cell‐to‐cell functional heterogeneity. Rigid biomaterial surfaces give rise to unphysiological, multiphasic contractions in hiPSC‐CM monolayers. Flexible substrates are necessary for normal twitch‐like contractility kinetics and interpretation of inotropic interventions. Key points Spatiotemporal contractility analysis of human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocyte (hiPSC‐CM) monolayers seeded on conventional, rigid surfaces (glass or plastic) revealed the presence of multiphasic contraction patterns across the monolayer with a high variability, despite action potentials recorded in the same areas being identical.These multiphasic patterns are not present in single cells, in detached monolayers or in monolayers seeded on soft substrates such as a hydrogel, where only ‘twitch’‐like transients are observed.HiPSC‐CM monolayers that display a high percentage of regions with multiphasic contraction have significantly increased contractile duration and a decreased lusotropic drug response.There is no indication that the multiphasic contraction patterns are associated with significant activation of the stress‐activated NPPA or NPPB signalling pathways.A computational model of cell clusters supports the biological findings that the rigid surface and the differential cell–substrate adhesion underly multiphasic contractile behaviour of hiPSC‐CMs.