Abstract
ABSTRACT In spite of extensive research and development work illustrating the significant advantages of Electrically Stimulated Filters (ESF's), this technology has not been commercially successful. This paper addresses this subject by analyzing conventional filter and ESF cost effectiveness in HEFA, clean room and indoor air cleaning applications. A new cost effective form of ESF technology has been considered: a single (charging and collection) field device. The laboratory performance of five commercially available conventional filters and the new ESF is characterized in terms of efficiency versus particle size, flow rate versus pressure drop and dirt loading characteristics. Using this information and the application requirements, the cost effectiveness of the ESF has been established with respect to conventional filters. Both initial and operating costs are discussed. The results show that ESF technology is cost effective for indoor applications even where space constraints are not important. Space co...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
