Abstract
Traditional approaches to thoracic metastases and spinal cord compression have been well worked out and validated in the literature. Anterior decompression is clearly superior to laminectomy; vertebrectomy and reconstruction are indicated for sagittal collapse, instability, and pain; and surgical decompression is necessary in cases of bony impingement. The role of endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques in treatment of metastatic disease is evolving. Dr. Lieberman advocates the use of thoracoscopic anterior approaches as the principal application in these patients, whereas Dr. McLain has found that endoscopic assistance has vastly improved his results with posterolateral decompression. The two authors weigh the relative advantages and disadvantages of these approaches for the selected patient with metastatic thoracic disease.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
