Abstract
This article applies the lens of controversies to explore tensions in the interactions among different actors engaged in employee-driven innovation (EDI) in the Danish public healthcare. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with innovation executives and consultants, non-clinical professionals with managerial responsibilities, and clinical professionals. In addition, observation and document analysis were conducted for triangulation purposes. The findings suggest that controversies are process-sensitive, dynamic forces that could become either destructive or constructive, with the potential to re-shape EDI. When mitigation is possible, new insights are generated; when mitigation is not achievable, the more destructive side of controversies emerges, calling for external interventions. This article contributes to the growing study of the human side of innovation and to the call for research on tensions in innovation processes. Leaders of public healthcare organizations could apply the insights to improve EDI strategies, nurture a sense of belonging in the workplace, and reduce opposition to change.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
