Abstract
AbstractA plethora of different electronic and optoelectronic devices have been developed lately, for biosensing applications (e.g., label‐free, fast, and easier to operate) based on a detecting interface accommodating the biorecognition elements, anchored by thiolate self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) on a gold surface. Here, a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) characterization of anti‐p24 anchored on different SAMs is performed to investigate the effect of the SAM structure on the antibodies’ packing efficiency and the sensors’ analytical figures of merit. Notably, the mixed SAM deposited from a solution 10:1 of 3‐mercaptopropionic acid and 11‐mercaptoundecanoic acid (11MUA) is compared to that resulting from a solution 10:1 of ad hoc synthesized N‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐3‐mercaptopropanamide (NMPA)/11MUA. Despite the improvement in the anti‐p24 surface coverage registered using the 11MUA/NMPA SAM, the latter produces a significant decrease in the antibodies’ binding efficiency against human immunodeficiency virus p24 protein. To provide a molecular rationale behind the SPR data, density functional theory calculations are also undertaken. A comprehensive physical view of the main competing phenomena affecting the biorecognition events at a biofunctionalized gold detecting interface is represented here.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
