Abstract

We previously developed a surface-assisted assay to image early steps of cell-induced plasma fibronectin (FN) fibrillogenesis by timelapse atomic force microscopy (AFM). Unexpectedly, complementary attempts to visualize FN fibrillogenesis using fluorescently labeled FN (Alexa Fluor 488 or 568) and live-cell light microscopy initially failed consistently. Further analysis revealed that fibrillar remodeling was inhibited efficiently in the focal area illuminated during fluorescence imaging, but progressed normally elsewhere on the substrate, suggesting photo sensitivity of the FN fibrillogenesis process. In agreement, active cell-driven fibrillar extension of FN could be stopped by transient illumination with visible light during AFM timelapse scanning. Phototoxic effects on the cells could be ruled out, because pre-illuminating the FN layer before cell seeding also blocked subsequent fibrillar formation. Varying the illumination wavelength range between 400 and 640 nm revealed strong inhibition across the visible spectrum up to 560 nm, and a decreasing inhibitory effect at longer wavelengths. The photo effect also affected unlabeled FN, but was enhanced by fluorophore labeling of FN. The inhibitory effect could be reduced when reactive oxygen species (ROS) were removed for the cell imaging medium. Based on these findings, FN fibrillogenesis could be imaged successfully using a labeling dye with a long excitation wavelength (Alexa Fluor 633, excitation at 632 nm) and ROS scavengers, such as oxyrase, in the imaging medium. Fibrillar remodeling of exposed cell-free FN layers by AFM scanning required higher scan forces compared to non-exposed FN, consisting with mechanical stiffing of the FN layer after illumination. In agreement with changes in FN mechanics, cells spreading on pre-exposed FN showed reduced migration speeds, altered focal adhesion arrangement, and changes in mechanosensitive signaling pathways, including reduced FAK (Y397) and paxillin (Y118) phosphorylation. Pre-exposure of FN to visible light prior to cell seeding thus provides a useful tool to delineate mechanosensitive signaling pathway related to FN fibrillogenesis. When using FN-coated cell adhesion substrates, care should be taken when comparing experimental results obtained on non-exposed FN layers in cell culture incubators, or during live-cell fluorescence imaging, as FN fibrillogenesis and mechanosensitive cellular signaling pathways may be affected differently.

Highlights

  • Fibronectin (FN) is a large dimeric extracellular matrix glycoprotein with a wide range of functions during embryogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and wound healing (Grinnell, 1984; Pankov and Yamada, 2002; Zollinger and Smith, 2017)

  • Cell-induced FN fibrillogenesis has been previously studied by seeding fibroblasts or other cell types onto glass substrates homogenously coated with a homogenous FN layer, which cells remodel into fibrillar structures over the course of several hours (Avnur and Geiger, 1981)

  • Atomic force microscopy is a surface scanning method and cannot image nascent FN fibrils forming in central areas of the basal cell side

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fibronectin (FN) is a large dimeric extracellular matrix glycoprotein with a wide range of functions during embryogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and wound healing (Grinnell, 1984; Pankov and Yamada, 2002; Zollinger and Smith, 2017). Fibronectin is an important matrix scaffold and cell adhesion protein, providing cell anchorage to the extracellular matrix via integrin receptor binding sites (Singh et al, 2010; Schwarzbauer and DeSimone, 2011). Soluble plasma FN is produced by hepatocytes and released into the blood stream and circulates until it becomes activated at sites of tissue injury (Zardi et al, 1979). There it is incorporated into fibrin clots, providing a scaffold for subsequent cell recruitment and helping to reestablish tissue integrity. Cellular FN is synthesized by fibroblasts and other cell types and incorporated directly into the surrounding extracellular matrix for cross-linking and stabilization (To and Midwood, 2011), growth factor attachment and providing a scaffold cell adhesion and for guiding cell migration (Boucaut et al, 1990; Erdogan and Webb, 2017; Yang et al, 2017)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call