Controlling erosion while fostering plant biodiversity: A comparison of riverbank stabilization techniques

Abstract

Bioengineering techniques have been encouraged over “hard” civil engineering such as riprap for recovering naturalness on stabilized riverbanks, but their effectiveness in reproducing the plant species diversity and vegetation succession present on non-stabilized (natural) riverbanks has rarely been assessed. Here, we compared alpha and beta diversity and successional trajectories of plant communities along the vertical profile of natural (40 sites), bioengineered (51) and riprap (33) riverbanks, in 55 streams of the second- to seventh-order in the province of Quebec (eastern Canada). Richness of total, hydrochorous and native species was higher on natural riverbanks than on those stabilized by riprap techniques along all riverbank elevations (upper, middle and lower parts of the riverbank). Bioengineered sites showed intermediate values. Natural sites contributed most to beta diversity on the upper bank, riprap sites on the middle bank. Temporal changes in species richness were observed only on the upper and middle banks, with an increase on riprap sites and a decrease on bioengineered sites. Beta diversity was mainly stable through time. Plant composition on bioengineered sites converged to that on natural sites for all bioengineering techniques at all bank levels, whereas for ripraps it did so only on the lower bank. For all bioengineering techniques, plant succession was driven by increasing native and hydrochorous species at all bank levels. Bioengineering is an effective alternative to riprap on stabilized riverbanks that leads to plant diversity and succession that most resemble those on natural riverbanks.