Abstract
Controllability of Technosphere and Paradigm of Global Evolutionism
Highlights
For several decades the scientific community proposes the programs of nature protection, despite it there are no significant results in the sphere of the prevention of the negative results of the industrial growth, which is explained by the fact the programs are not substantiated enough theoretically
The term “machine” must emphasize that social institutes are “special technique” for providing the organization conditions of “technological means” of solving social problems [Rozin, 2012: 186]. This view on technique is opposed by Vadim Rozin to traditional “scientific-engineering” picture of the world, in which it was considered that the technique “does not influence man because it is the means of man and nature and contains the laws on the basis of which technique can function”
What existing thing can perform the role of reality, which is more complicated and performs the conversion of the outer environment into the internal one, “artificial”? Only technical reality! In modern world, only technique can have all the features of a developing subsystem: it increases its interconnection and interrelationship increasing the speed of converting information and its autonomy from the environment
Summary
For several decades the scientific community proposes the programs of nature protection, despite it there are no significant results in the sphere of the prevention of the negative results of the industrial growth, which is explained by the fact the programs are not substantiated enough theoretically. The majority of the researchers explain the modern global problems by the acceleration of the technical progress and the uncontrollable growth of the technosphere created by it [Bazaluk, 2014; 2016; Krichevsky, 2016; Nazaretyan, 2015; Ursul, 2015; Yablokov et al, 2015; 2016; 2017]. There is stated the controllability of technosphere lack and concluded that it is the cause of man-caused crises; there are offered various concepts explaining the necessity and possibility of control over the technical reality evolution [Krichevsky, 2015], but they are all criticized. As Sergey Krichevsky states, “in the 21st century the priority and key issue is the controllability of technosphere evolution, which is a part of the evolution control overall problem” [Krichevsky, 2017a: 155]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
