Abstract

Ever since the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic, various public health control strategies have been proposed and tested against the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. We study three specific COVID-19 epidemic control models: the susceptible, exposed, infectious, recovered (SEIR) model with vaccination control; the SEIR model with shield immunity control; and the susceptible, un-quarantined infected, quarantined infected, confirmed infected (SUQC) model with quarantine control. We express the control requirement in metric temporal logic (MTL) formulas (a type of formal specification languages) which can specify the expected control outcomes such as “the deaths from the infection should never exceed one thousand per day within the next three months” or “the population immune from the disease should eventually exceed 200 thousand within the next 100 to 120 days”. We then develop methods for synthesizing control strategies with MTL specifications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to systematically synthesize control strategies based on the COVID-19 epidemic models with formal specifications. We provide simulation results in three different case studies: vaccination control for the COVID-19 epidemic with model parameters estimated from data in Lombardy, Italy; shield immunity control for the COVID-19 epidemic with model parameters estimated from data in Lombardy, Italy; and quarantine control for the COVID-19 epidemic with model parameters estimated from data in Wuhan, China. The results show that the proposed synthesis approach can generate control inputs such that the time-varying numbers of individuals in each category (e.g., infectious, immune) satisfy the MTL specifications. The results also show that early intervention is essential in mitigating the spread of COVID-19, and more control effort is needed for more stringent MTL specifications. For example, based on the model in Lombardy, Italy, achieving less than 100 deaths per day and 10000 total deaths within 100 days requires 441.7% more vaccination control effort than achieving less than 1000 deaths per day and 50000 total deaths within 100 days.

Highlights

  • The COVID-19 pandemic [1] has caused over 28 million confirmed cases and over 0.91 million deaths globally as of September 12, 2020

  • We provide simulation results in three different case studies: vaccination control for COVID-19 epidemic with model parameters estimated from data in Lombardy, Italy; shield immunity control for COVID-19 epidemic with model parameters estimated from data in Lombardy, Italy; and quarantine control for COVID-19 epidemic with model parameters estimated from data in Wuhan, China

  • It can be seen that the three metric temporal logic (MTL) specifications φ1V, φ2V and φ3V are all violated in such a situation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic [1] has caused over 28 million confirmed cases and over 0.91 million deaths globally as of September 12, 2020. Ever since the outbreak of COVID-19, various public health control strategies have been proposed and tested against the coronavirus SARSCoV-2 [2,3,4]. Other strategies have been proposed to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. In [6], the authors proposed shield immunity to protect the susceptible people from getting infected with SARS-CoV-2. Shield immunity works by first identifying and deploying recovered individuals who have protective antibodies to SARSCoV-2, and increasing the proportion of interactions with recovered individuals as opposed to other individuals. In [7], the authors analyzed how quarantine has mitigated the spread of SARS-CoV-2 based on a model that differentiates quarantined infected individuals and un-quarantined infected individuals

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.