Abstract
A low-order amine scrubbing model was developed for an intercooled absorber and advanced flash stripper configuration with piperazine solvent. The low-order lumped parameter model uses semi-empirical thermodynamics and rate-based mass transfer and embeds reaction kinetics in a constant overall transfer coefficient. The predicted off-design steady state of this model is compared to a high-order Aspen Plus simulation for 100–85% power plant load. The difference in CO2 removal rate between the two models is less than 1% when power plant load is greater than 94%. The removal rate is systematically overpredicted in the low-order model because a constant CO2 mass transfer coefficient in the absorber leads to an overprediction of absorber performance at part-load operation. Compared to pilot plant data, the low-order model captures the dynamic response of a step change in the stripper pressure control valve. The characteristic time of the total CO2 inventory is found to be 77 min, compared to a total liquid resi...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
