Abstract

Public policy research is often directed at welfare-enhancing behavior change using interventions that provide consumers with helpful information and tools. We suggest that the effectiveness of public policy interventions and related outcomes are dependent on individual differences in consumers’ self-control. The present research examines how healthy eating and responsible spending outcomes are influenced by low (vs. high) self-control at general and domain-specific levels. We raise important questions regarding the theoretical basis of self-control individual differences and investigate the relative efficacy of general and domain-specific measures in predicting eating and spending outcomes. We propose a new measurement approach to increase measurement standardization and comparability of results in self-control studies and empirically demonstrate its value. Recommendations are provided to public policy researchers and practitioners concerning the role of general and domain-specific individual differences in self-control and their implications for designing and testing effective interventions to improve consumer health and financial well-being.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call