Abstract

Abstract Tomato seedlings “Agriset” from a commercial plant house were transplanted on 7 Mar 96, 18 in between plants, into raised beds 32 in wide and 250 ft long on 6-ft centers. They were covered with black polyethylene film mulch. A dry bottom mix of 50 lbs N, 160 lbs P and 80 lbs K per acre was placed at the bottom of the beds and an additional 3.25 lbs per acre N and K was fertigated 3 times a week by drip irrigation. The plants were sprayed weekly with an alternating combination of Maneb 80 WP at 1.5 lb/acre plus Kocide 101 at 2 lb/acre and Bravo 720 at 2 pt/acre for disease control. Dipel was added to the disease control sprays when needed at a rate of 1 lb product/acre. Each of the 4 beds was used as a replication divided into 5 plots separated by 2-ft buffers, with each 48-ft plot randomly assigned to 5 treatments. Applications were initiated 16 May when whitefly population was established and continued weekly for 3 weeks. Spray was delivered using two different types of spray equipment: a high clearance sprayer utilizing an hydraulic pump operating at 200 psi, delivering spray through 6 Yellow Albuz hollow cone nozzles, 3 per drop boom at a volume of 69 gpa at 2.5 mph, and a Berthoud airboom sprayer delivering spray material at 50 psi through 6 Brown Albuz nozzles, atomized by an airblast 172 mph and dispensing at a volume of 35 gpa. Spray coverage was evaluated on 8 May by using water sensitive papers and spectophotmetric analysis of FD&C#1 blue dye deposited on paper targets. Plants were evaluated weekly for the presence of whitefly adults, eggs, nymphs, pupa and parasitized pupae on a trifoliate from the 6th node of 8 randomly selected plants per plot. Counts were made using stereoscopic microscope by placing a 1 cm sq template twice on each side of the midvein of each leaflet (4 cm2/leaflet = 12 cm2/trifoliate = 96 cm2 per plot). Adult whitefiies were evaluated by striking plants 5 times with a 9.5" X 13" pie pan painted black and covered with a 9:1 oil/detergent mixture (N = 6/plots). Fruit was not harvested for evaluation because a heavy infestation of pin worm and high incidence of disease on many of the plots would have rendered the data of little value.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call