Abstract
In this perspective article, we address the controversy regarding the safety-efficacy issue in ipilimumab trials. While the CTLA-4 blockade interrupted T-cell pathways responsible for immune down-regulation and mediated regression of established malignant tumors in a minority of patients, this has to be weighed against the immune related adverse events (irAEs) suffered by the majority. Based on two groundbreaking but neglected proof-of-principle papers that demonstrated augmented graft-vs.-malignancy (GVM) effect that reversed the relapse of malignancy without worsening the graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) by a CTLA-4 blockade, here we suggest a therapeutic paradigm shift, which may help break the impasse and resolve this timely issue in oncology.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
