Control of gastric pH with cimetidine: Boluses versus primed infusions

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that antacids are more effective than intravenous cimetidine in maintaining the gastric pH above 4.0 in acutely ill patients. We hypothesized that this was because blood levels of cimetidine are not sustained at therapeutic levels with the bolus doses. The purpose of this study was to compare gastric pH and serum cimetidine levels when cimetidine was administered as bolus versus infusion. We studied 23 acutely ill patients who received intravenous cimetidine given as boluses and primed infusions. The gastric pH could be maintained above 4.0 with infusions of up to 50 mg/ h (1200 mg/day) in 20 patients, compared with only 5 patients with bolus administrations of up to 300 mg every 6 h (1200 mg/day). The differences in ability to maintain the gastric pH above 4.0 were entirely due to the reduced ability of bolus infusion to maintain an adequate serum level. Neither technique could maintain the pH above 4.0 in 3 patients, all of whom had received cimetidine recently. A gastric pH >4.0 correlated directly with a therapeutic serum cimetidine level. We conclude that infusions of cimetidine are better able to sustain therapeutic blood levels and, therefore, are superior to bolus cimetidine in maintaining gastric pH above 4.0. Some patients, however, may not respond to cimetidine even if therapeutic levels are achieved and may require supplemental antacids.