Abstract

The cross-slot stagnation point flow is one of the benchmark problems in non-Newtonian fluid mechanics as it allows large strains to develop and can therefore be used for extensional rheometry measurements or, once instability arises, as a mixing device. In such a flow, beyond a critical value for which the ratio of elastic force to viscous force is high enough, elasticity can break symmetry even in the absence of significant inertial forces (i.e. creeping flow), which is an unwanted phenomenon if the device is to be used as a rheometer but beneficial from a mixing perspective. In this work, a passive control mechanism is introduced to the cross-slot by adding a cylinder at the geometric centre to replace the ‘free’ stagnation point with ‘pinned’ stagnation points at the surface of the cylinder. In the current modified geometry, effects of the blockage ratio (the ratio of the diameter of the cylinder to the width of the channel), the Weissenberg number (the ratio of elastic forces to viscous forces) and extensibility parameters ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ and $L^{2}$) are investigated in two-dimensional numerical simulations using both the simplified Phan-Thien and Tanner and finitely extensible nonlinear elastic models. It is shown that the blockage ratio for fixed solvent-to-total-viscosity ratio has a stabilizing effect on the associated symmetry-breaking instability. The resulting data show that the suggested modification, although significantly changing the flow distribution in the region near the stagnation point, does not change the nature of the symmetry-breaking instability or, for low blockage ratio, the critical condition for onset. Using both numerical and physical experiments coupled with a supporting theoretical analysis, we conclude that this instability cannot therefore be solely related to the extensional flow near the stagnation point but it is more likely related to streamline curvature and the high deformation rates towards the corners, i.e. a classic ‘curved streamlines’ purely elastic instability. Our work also suggests that the proposed geometric modification can be an effective approach for enabling higher flow rates to be achieved whilst retaining steady symmetric flow.

Highlights

  • Extensional flow occurs when a fluid experiences a deformation in the streamwise direction and can be observed in many different situations such as flow passing through contractions (Afonso et al 2011) and expansions (Pinho, Oliveira & Miranda 2003; Alves & Poole 2007) and at stagnation point flows like flow throughM

  • We use a series of 2-D numerical simulations, experimental results and a supporting approximate analytical solution to determine the M parameter (1.1) to show that this instability cannot be solely related to the extensional flow near the stagnation point and is more likely related to streamline curvature and the high deformation rates nearer the re-entrant corners

  • Results presented in the left-hand column of figure 7 show the effect of elastic stress on the streamline distribution superimposed on the flow-type parameter for small values of Wi before the onset of the symmetry-breaking purely elastic instability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extensional flow occurs when a fluid experiences a deformation in the streamwise direction and can be observed in many different situations such as flow passing through contractions (Afonso et al 2011) and expansions (Pinho, Oliveira & Miranda 2003; Alves & Poole 2007) and at stagnation point flows like flow through. Many industrial processes deal with highly extensional flows of polymeric fluids. In most of these cases, a purely elastic instability occurs that is absent for its equivalent Newtonian creeping flow (Poole et al 2007a; Zilz et al 2014). During the last few decades, significant attention has been placed on such flows to characterize the physics behind these types of instabilities especially in shear flows (Larson, Shaqfeh & Muller 1990; McKinley, Pakdel & Öztekin 1996); understanding of this type of elastic instability in extensional-dominated flows is not as advanced as for shear-dominated flows (Haward, McKinley & Shen 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.