Abstract

AbstractThe balance of physical and biological processes governing phytoplankton growth rates and the accumulation of biomass is widely debated in the literature, notably during the winter–spring transition. Here we show, in a temperate shelf sea that variability in the depth of the actively mixing surface layer is the leading order control. During a 2‐week period preceding the peak of the spring bloom we observe two distinct regimes; first, growth within the euphotic zone during the day and re‐distribution of new biomass to the seasonal pycnocline at night by convective mixing; then, more rapid biomass accumulation trapped within a shallower, wind‐driven actively mixing layer that was decoupled from the pycnocline below. Our observations of the bloom in the Celtic Sea, Northwest European Shelf, were made using ocean gliders and include measurements of the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy. A 1‐D phytoplankton growth model driven by our measurements of dissipation and incident irradiance replicates the observed bloom and reinforces the conclusion that physical processes that mediate light availability were key. Day‐to‐day variability in cloud cover and the ability of phytoplankton to acclimate to their light environment were also important factors in determining growth rates, and the timing of the biomass peak. Our results emphasize the need for accurate turbulent mixing parameterizations in coupled hydrodynamic‐ecosystem models. Our findings are applicable to any region where wind‐driven mixing can modify nutrient and light availability, especially across subpolar shelves in the northern hemisphere where light rather than nutrients is typically the limiting factor on phytoplankton growth.

Highlights

  • IntroductionBrody and Lozier (2014) proposed that a decrease in the dominant mixing length scale from deep winter convection to a shallower wind mixing regime above the compensation depth (where net phytoplankton growth is zero) is a reliable condition for the initiation of the spring bloom

  • Averaging the number of particles in each depth bin across the whole 24-d simulation, we find that the maximum deviation from the original uniform particle distribution is < 1.5% within 5 m of the surface and bottom, and < 5% within the euphotic zone (31 m)

  • Our gliders were deployed during this time and we initially observe modest increases in phytoplankton biomass within the nutrient replete euphotic zone during the day, followed by redistribution of this biomass to the depth of the pycnocline by convective overturning at night (Fig. 10a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brody and Lozier (2014) proposed that a decrease in the dominant mixing length scale from deep winter convection to a shallower wind mixing regime above the compensation depth (where net phytoplankton growth is zero) is a reliable condition for the initiation of the spring bloom. Such conditions can occur when surface heat fluxes are still negative (i.e., convective), the seasonal thermocline is deep or when stratification is still weak. In subtropical regions, where nutrient availability rather than light is the limiting factor on phytoplankton growth, mixed layer deepening during the winter provides an essential injection of nutrients that may stimulate high enough growth rates to support an increase in biomass throughout the entire, deepening mixed layer (Zarubin et al 2017)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call