Abstract
Reliable and robust control of power converters is a key issue in the performance of numerous technological devices. In this paper we show a design technique for the control of a DC-DC buck converter with a switching technique that guarantees both good performance and global stability. We show that making use of the contraction theorem in the Jordan canonical form of the buck converter, it is possible to find a switching surface that guarantees stability but it is incapable of rejecting load perturbations. To overcome this, we expand the system to include the dynamics of the voltage error and we demonstrate that the same design procedure is not only able to stabilize the system to the desired operation point but also to reject load, input voltage, and reference voltage perturbations.
Highlights
Many industrial and residential applications use voltage regulation with DC-DC power converters; such applications include fuel cells [1], photovoltaic sources [2,3], control of DC motors [4], lighting appliances [5], computer power supplies [6], and many others
In this paper we developed a switched control action for the buck power converter that guarantees global asymptotic stability, by applying recent results from contraction analysis
We took advantage of the Jordan canonical form of the system to fulfill the conditions of global stability resulting from contraction analysis, which wouldn’t have been met in the original form of the system
Summary
Many industrial and residential applications use voltage regulation with DC-DC power converters; such applications include fuel cells [1], photovoltaic sources [2,3], control of DC motors [4], lighting appliances [5], computer power supplies [6], and many others. More than 90% of the total amount of power supply in the world is processed through power converters [10]. For this reason, a precise control of these converters is a critical factor and a vast amount of literature has been devoted to their control. PID-based schemes [11], Fuzzy PID control [12], robust controllers [13], predictive control [14], sliding mode control [15], and a controller based on a modified pulse-adjustment of the PWM [16], just to mention few
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
