Control Compounds for Preclinical Drug-Induced Liver Injury Assessment: Consensus-driven systematic review by the ProEuroDILI Network

Abstract

Background & AimsIdiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex and unpredictable event caused by drugs, herbal or dietary supplements. Early identification of human hepatotoxicity at preclinical stages remains a major challenge, in which the selection of validated in vitro systems and test drugs has a significant impact. This systematic review analyzed the compounds used in hepatotoxicity assays and established a list of DILI positive and negative control drugs for validation of in vitro models of DILI, supported by literature and clinical evidence and endorsed by an expert committee from COST Action ProEuroDILI Network (CA17112). MethodsFollowing 2020 PRISMA guidelines, original research articles focusing on DILI which used in vitro human models and performed at least one hepatotoxicity assay with positive and negative control compounds, were included. Bias of the studies was assessed by a modified ‘Toxicological Data Reliability Assessment Tool’. Results51 studies (out of 2,936) met the inclusion criteria, with 30 categorized as reliable without restrictions. Although there was a broad consensus on positive compounds, the selection of negative compounds lacked clarity. 2D monoculture, short exposure times and cytotoxicity endpoints were the most tested, although there was no consensus on the drug concentrations. ConclusionsThe extensive analysis highlighted the lack of agreement on control compounds for in vitro DILI assessment. Following comprehensive in vitro and clinical data analysis together with input from the expert committee, an evidence-based consensus-driven list of 10 positive and negative drugs is proposed for validating in vitro models for improving preclinical drug safety testing regimes. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONSPrediction of human toxicity early in the drug development process remains a major challenge. For this, human in vitro models are becoming increasingly important, however, the development of more physiologically relevant liver models and careful selection of control DILI+ and DILI- drugs are requisites to better predict DILI liability of new drug candidates. Thus, this systematic study holds critical implications for standardizing validation of new in vitro models for studying drug-induced liver injury (DILI). By establishing a consensus-driven list of positive and negative control drugs, the study provides a scientifically justified framework for enhancing the consistency of preclinical testing, thereby addressing a significant challenge in early hepatotoxicity identification. The results are of paramount importance to all the actors involved in the drug development process, offering a standardized approach to assess hepatotoxic risks. Practically, these findings can guide researchers in evaluating safety profiles of new drugs, refining in vitro models, and informing regulatory agencies on potential improvements to regulatory guidelines, ensuring a more systematic and efficient approach to drug safety assessment.