Abstract

To investigate the influence of the change of tip clearance size on the control effect of the endwall suction, the effects of endwall suction on the aerodynamic performance of the axial compressor cascade were studied numerically. Three tip clearance sizes of 0.5% h, 1.0% h, and 2.0% h (h is the blade height) were mainly considered. The results show that the endwall suction scheme whose coverage range was 8–33% axial chord can reduce the leakage flow and improve the aerodynamic performance by directly influencing the structure of tip leakage vortex. The overall total pressure loss coefficients of the three clearance size schemes at 0° angle of incidence with 0.4 inlet Mach number are reduced by about 10.3%, 10.8%, and 6.0%, respectively, at the suction flow rate of 0.7%. Under the same suction flow rate, the onset position of the tip leakage vortex of the cascade with small clearance is shifted from the 15% of the axial chord length of original to the 48% of the axial chord length, which with large clearance is nearly no changed. The leakage flow rate and the distance from the leakage vortex to the suction slot are the main reasons for the different control effect of the endwall suction under different tip clearance sizes. The difference of the spanwise distribution of flow field parameters may also cause the difference of flow control effect.

Highlights

  • To prevent friction and collision between the compressor rotor tip and the casing as well as between the blade root of the cantilever stator and the hub, the clearance is introduced

  • Some fluid flows from the pressure surface (PS) side to the suction surface (SS) side to form the tip leakage flow (TLF) driven by the pressure difference, which is affected by the main flow and the boundary layer of the endwall, and develops downstream in the form of the tip leakage vortex (TLV)

  • Is the suction scheme designed for the static clearance at the high load axial diffuser cascade as the object, and mainly studies the control effect of the endwall suction (ES) scheme on design point still applicable when the tip clearance size (TCS) changes? What happens to the suction effect? These are the questions that this paper focuses on and will solve

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To prevent friction and collision between the compressor rotor tip and the casing as well as between the blade root of the cantilever stator and the hub, the clearance is introduced. Some fluid flows from the pressure surface (PS) side to the suction surface (SS) side to form the tip leakage flow (TLF) driven by the pressure difference, which is affected by the main flow and the boundary layer of the endwall, and develops downstream in the form of the tip leakage vortex (TLV). The results show that the endwall loss caused by tip clearance accounts for ~20–40% of the total loss, which has a serious impact on the overall performance of the compressor [1,2,3]. With the increase of the compressor blade load, the transverse pressure gradient increases, so does the leakage flow intensity, which has a negative impact on the compressor flow field.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call