Abstract
"The help provided by technological tools is beneficial to the clinical act. At this point, it is necessary for the physician to know how to investigate auxiliary procedures to achieve the diagnostic complementarities offered by semiology. Technology is not an isolated entity in the interpretation of elements that are added to the clinical act; in fact, it cannot decide by itself. Also, this does not lead to proper medical training. There should be no technological abuse in pursuit of a diagnosis. This does not improve or replace the clinical act, because unless properly interpreted, these studies can be misleading. An excessive value given to auxiliary procedures can lead to clinical error and neglect the "human factor", a pillar in medical practice"
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
