Contributions of open-loop and closed-loop control in a continuous tracking task differ depending on attentional demands during practice.

Abstract

Improving tracking performance requires numerous adjustments in the motor system, including peripheral muscle functions and central motor commands. These commands can rely on sensory feedback processing during tracking, i.e., closed-loop control. In the case of repeated tracking sequences, these commands can rely on an inner representation of the target trajectory to optimize pre-planning, i.e., open-loop control. Implicit learning in a continuous tracking task with repeated sequences proves the availability of an inner target representation, which emerges by learning task regularities, even without explicit knowledge. We hypothesize that the actual use of open-loop or closed-loop control is influenced by the demand for attention. Specifically, we suggest that closed-loop control and its development during practice need attentional resources, whereas open-loop control can work and evolve in a more automatic way without attentional demands. To test this, we investigated motor-control strategies when extensively practicing a continuous compensatory force-tracking task using isometric leg muscle activation, either as a single-motor task or as a motor-cognitive dual task. After training, we found evidence for predominantly closed-loop control in the single-task training group and for open-loop control in the dual-task training group. In particular, we ascertained dual-task motor costs and a weakly developed implicit knowledge of task regularities in the single-task training group. In contrast, in the dual-task training group dual-task motor costs disappeared, while implicit learning was clearly observed. We conclude that motor-cognitive dual-task training may boost implicit motor learning, without necessarily impeding concurrent improvement in the cognitive task. Data repository: reserved doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6759377.