Abstract
Sesquioxides are an important class of compounds which are used in various applications such as optical glasses, high-power electronics, and gate dielectrics. Using density functional theory, we investigated bixbyite ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}, {\mathrm{In}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$, and ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$; hexagonal ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$; corundum ${\mathrm{In}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$; and monoclinic ${\mathrm{Ga}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$. We compared the predicted structural properties for each material using the local density approximation (LDA) and the generalized-gradient approximation [GGA PBE (Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof)]. We found that LDA predicts the correct ground state structure for all three sesquioxides; however, GGA PBE predicts the incorrect ground state structure for ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$. To gain better insight on why this happens, we calculated the phonon properties and the free energy for all structures to determine phase transition temperatures. Additionally, we determined the transition pressure for ${\mathrm{In}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$. We also studied several surface terminations for each compound and determined the lowest-energy surface for each structure as well as the interfacial energy for ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.