Contribution To The Construction Of The Subject Of Theological Anthropology

Abstract

"e anthropological upheaval in theology is connected with certain changes in theway of practising philosophy in the (/‰Š and )‚‰Š centuries. Of course, Kant’s revolutionwas of fundamental importance. With regard to the theological anthropologyof K. Rahner’s situation, it can be described as follows: “…this is a criticalreflection, which does not pass to the agenda over Kant’s ‘Copernican revolution,’but draws attention to the creative role of the subject in the process of cognition.A phenomenological reflection leN its mark on Rahner, from which he took overthe conviction that we perceive existence only through consciousness, more precisely:we learn about the structures of existence through the analysis of the givenconsciousness. So here is the source of the transcendental character of Rahneriananthropology. It is simply a reflection on man at the level of a priori conditions,anticipating external experience. "is is not necessarily a chronological order,but certainly a logical one, since every philosophical question about the externalexistence contains a hidden question about the sense of human existence.”