Contribution of the Reims School to the Debate on the Critical Analysis of International Law: Assessment and Limits

Abstract

The changes which have occurred in the world and the failure of the mechanism of collective security oblige lawyers to open a new critical approach to international law. In this context, it is important to come back to the French movement known as Critique du droit, and more especially to the work produced in the Reims Colloquia under Professor Chaumont�s authority. This theoretical contribution points out the link between the norms of law and the concrete conditions of their formation. It considers the compulsory nature of norms as a result of a compromise between several contradictions, and by doing so, it opens a new window on the understanding of law. But, today, this theory has to be completed by a deeper analysis of the concept of sovereignty. The consequence of this core concept is the contractual nature of most norms of international law. It is quite impossible to build a universal international law, the emergence of general imperative norms being hitherto too weak. International law, dominated by sovereignty, is inadequate to protect world society.