Abstract

Three genotypes of alfalfa viz. Medicago sativa (Zhongmu No. 1, Zhongmu No. 2) and M. varia (Caoyuan No. 3) grown in the filed were investigated for the contribution of pod wall and leaves by shading all pods and leaves on July 15, 20 and 25, respectively. Date was recorded for total pod weight (TPW), pod wall weight (PWW), seed weight per pod (SWP), seed number per pod (SNP) and single seed weight (SSW) of one-coil and two-coil spiral pods. TPW, SNP, PWW and SWP were reduced by shading all leaves or pods, whereas SSW was not significantly affected. The relative photosynthetic contribution of pod wall to SWP was 25.6–48.1% in three genotypes on July 15. The pod wall in one-coil spiral pods generated a greater relative contribution to the TPW and SWP than in two-coil spiral pods. In the last stage (July 25), the relative photosynthetic contribution of leaves to SWP sharply decreased, whereas the relative photosynthetic contribution of pod wall to SWP was stable in the late stage (July 20 and 25). In conclusion, the pod wall of alfalfa could carry out photosynthesis and the pod wall played an important role in pod filling at the late growth stage.

Highlights

  • Three genotypes of alfalfa viz. Medicago sativa (Zhongmu No 1, Zhongmu No 2) and M. varia (Caoyuan No 3) grown in the filed were investigated for the contribution of pod wall and leaves by shading all pods and leaves on July 15, 20 and 25, respectively

  • Date was recorded for total pod weight (TPW), pod wall weight (PWW), seed weight per pod (SWP), seed number per pod (SNP) and single seed weight (SSW) of one-coil and two-coil spiral pods

  • The results determined that the TPW of two pod types in three genotypes under shading all leaves at the same stages was lower than under shading all pods, except for the onecoil spiral pods on July 15, whereas the shaded pods could reduce the TPW compared to the control (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three genotypes of alfalfa viz. Medicago sativa (Zhongmu No 1, Zhongmu No 2) and M. varia (Caoyuan No 3) grown in the filed were investigated for the contribution of pod wall and leaves by shading all pods and leaves on July 15, 20 and 25, respectively. The relative photosynthetic contribution of pod wall to SWP was 25.6–48.1% in three genotypes on July 15. The pod wall in one-coil spiral pods generated a greater relative contribution to the TPW and SWP than in two-coil spiral pods. The internal recycling of CO2 inside the pod contributes to maintaining seed filling under drought conditions, whereas the leaves present a low rate of photosynthesis[12]. The photosynthesis of the pod wall in the late stage of pod-filling was steady and contributory, even when the photosynthetic ability of the leaves trended toward decreasing[16].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call