Abstract

The majority of airborne particles in residences, when expressed as number concentrations, are generated by the residents themselves, through combustion/thermal related activities. These particles have a considerably smaller diameter than 2.5 μm and, due to the combination of their small size, chemical composition (e.g. soot) and intermittently very high concentrations, should be regarded as having potential to cause adverse health effects.In this study, time resolved airborne particle measurements were conducted for seven consecutive days in 22 randomly selected homes in the urban area of Lund in southern Sweden. The main purpose of the study was to analyze the influence of human activities on the concentration of particles in indoor air. Focus was on number concentrations of particles with diameters <300 nm generated by indoor activities, and how these contribute to the integrated daily residential exposure. Correlations between these particles and soot mass concentration in total dust were also investigated.It was found that candle burning and activities related to cooking (using a frying pan, oven, toaster, and their combinations) were the major particle sources.The frequency of occurrence of a given concentration indoors and outdoors was compared for ultrafine particles. Indoor data was sorted into non-occupancy and occupancy time, and the occupancy time was further divided into non-activity and activity influenced time. It was found that high levels (above 104 cm−3) indoors mainly occur during active periods of occupancy, while the concentration during non-activity influenced time differs very little from non-occupancy time.Total integrated daily residential exposure of ultrafine particles was calculated for 22 homes, the contribution from known activities was 66%, from unknown activities 20%, and from background/non-activity 14%.The collected data also allowed for estimates of particle source strengths for specific activities, and for some activities it was possible to estimate correlations between the number concentration of ultrafine particles and the mass concentration of soot in total dust in 10 homes. Particle source strengths (for 7 specific activities) ranged from 1.6·1012 to 4.5·1012 min−1.The correlation between ultrafine particles and mass concentration of soot in total dust varied between 0.37 and 0.85, with an average of 0.56 (Pearson correlation coefficient).This study clearly shows that due to the importance of indoor sources, residential exposure to ultrafine particles cannot be characterized by ambient measurements alone.

Highlights

  • The main aims of this study were to analyze the influence of human activities on particles in indoor air, with focus on determining the differences between residential and outdoor number concentrations of ultrafine particles; to estimate contribution of indoor sources to integrated daily residential exposure; and to check correlation between mass concentration of soot in total dust and number concentration of ultrafine particles in residences in general as well as during different activities.In the industrialized part of the world, we spend approximately 65% of our lives in our homes (Leech et al, 2002; Brasche and Bischof, 2005)

  • This study clearly shows that due to the importance of indoor sources, residential exposure to ultrafine particles cannot be characterized by ambient measurements alone

  • Due to that the SMPS and the Nanotracer/Diffusion Size Classifier (DiSC) have very different time resolution, it is difficult to visualize them in the same figure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main aims of this study were to analyze the influence of human activities on particles in indoor air, with focus on determining the differences between residential and outdoor number concentrations of ultrafine particles; to estimate contribution of indoor sources to integrated daily residential exposure; and to check correlation between mass concentration of soot in total dust and number concentration of ultrafine particles in residences in general as well as during different activities.In the industrialized part of the world, we spend approximately 65% of our lives in our homes (Leech et al, 2002; Brasche and Bischof, 2005). The main aims of this study were to analyze the influence of human activities on particles in indoor air, with focus on determining the differences between residential and outdoor number concentrations of ultrafine particles; to estimate contribution of indoor sources to integrated daily residential exposure; and to check correlation between mass concentration of soot in total dust and number concentration of ultrafine particles in residences in general as well as during different activities. It is widely known that outdoor particles contribute to the indoor aerosol concentration levels, and in epidemiology, exposure is often determined based on the outdoor particle concentration. The outdoor contribution to the indoor aerosol size distribution is modified compared to the distribution outdoors, due to size-specific differences in penetration efficiency (Thatcher et al, 2003; Liu and Nazaroff, 2003; Nazaroff, 2004). For naturally ventilated buildings, Morawska and Salthammer (2003) summarized indoor/outdoor ratios (I/O) for PM10 and PM2.5 (particulate matter smaller than 10 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively) from

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call