Abstract

BackgroundX-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the epigenetic inactivation of one of two X chromosomes in XX eutherian mammals. The inactive X chromosome is the result of multiple silencing pathways that act in concert to deposit chromatin changes, including DNA methylation and histone modifications. Yet over 15% of genes escape or variably escape from inactivation and continue to be expressed from the otherwise inactive X chromosome. To the extent that they have been studied, epigenetic marks correlate with this expression.ResultsUsing publicly available data, we compared XCI status calls with DNA methylation, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9me3, H3K27ac, H3K27me3 and H3K36me3. At genes subject to XCI we found heterochromatic marks enriched, and euchromatic marks depleted on the inactive X when compared to the active X. Genes escaping XCI were more similar between the active and inactive X. Using sample-specific XCI status calls, we found some marks differed significantly with variable XCI status, but which marks were significant was not consistent between genes. A model trained to predict XCI status from these epigenetic marks obtained over 75% accuracy for genes escaping and over 90% for genes subject to XCI. This model made novel XCI status calls for genes without allelic differences or CpG islands required for other methods. Examining these calls across a domain of variably escaping genes, we saw XCI status vary across individual genes rather than at the domain level. Lastly, we compared XCI status calls to genetic polymorphisms, finding multiple loci associated with XCI status changes at variably escaping genes, but none individually sufficient to induce an XCI status change.ConclusionThe control of expression from the inactive X chromosome is multifaceted, but ultimately regulated at the individual gene level with detectable but limited impact of distant polymorphisms. On the inactive X, at silenced genes euchromatic marks are depleted while heterochromatic marks are enriched. Genes escaping inactivation show a less significant enrichment of heterochromatic marks and depletion of H3K27ac. Combining all examined marks improved XCI status prediction, particularly for genes without CpG islands or polymorphisms, as no single feature is a consistent feature of silenced or expressed genes.

Highlights

  • In eutherian mammals, one of the two X chromosomes (X) is epigenetically inactivated in XX females in order to achieve dosage compensation with XY males through a process known as X-chromosome inactivation (XCI)

  • Given the heterogeneity in XCI status among tissues and individuals, we focussed on data from the Center for Epigenome Mapping Technologies (CEMT) as these samples were derived from cancer and were anticipated to have a high frequency of skewed XCI, allowing us to use allelic expression to determine XCI status in each sample [11]

  • As cancer is known to have epigenetic changes, we examined data from Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), another group within International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC), allowing us to determine whether any trends that we observed in the CEMT data were due to the samples being cancer-derived

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the two X chromosomes (X) is epigenetically inactivated in XX females in order to achieve dosage compensation with XY males through a process known as X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) (see Balaton, 2018 for a review [1]). This inactivation is Balaton and Brown Epigenetics & Chromatin (2021) 14:30 incomplete, as approximately 12% of genes consistently escape from XCI in humans [2], here defined as having at least 10% expression from the inactive X (Xi) as compared to the active X (Xa) [3]. To the extent that they have been studied, epigenetic marks correlate with this expression

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call