Abstract
ObjectiveTo examine whether a single repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) helps discriminate cancer from non–cancer-related PSA elevation. MethodsMen aged 50–70 yr (n=54,087) in a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing treatments for localised prostate cancer were tested. A total of 4102 (7.6%) with an initial PSA in the range of 3–19.9ng/ml had repeat measurement (median interval: 50 d) followed by prostate biopsy. The decision to biopsy was based on the first PSA level. The outcome was the presence of prostate cancer on biopsy. ResultsMen with a 20% drop in PSA had a lower risk of cancer (odds ratio [OR]=0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.52; p<0.001) and high-grade cancer (OR=0.29; 95%CI, 0.19–0.44; p<0.001) compared to the rest of the cohort. The effect of percentage reduction was greater in men aged ≤60 yr than in those >60 yr. (OR for any cancer=1.6; 95%CI, 1.0–2.4; p=0.05; OR for high-grade cancer=2.9; 95%CI, 1.2–6.7; p=0.014). This equated to a risk reduction of high-grade cancer from 4% to 0.5%, 6% to 2%, and 15% to 2% in men ≤60 yr with an initial PSA of 3.0–3.99, 4.0–5.99, and ≥6ng/ml, respectively. No level of repeat PSA confidently predicted absence of cancer. ConclusionFollowing an initial PSA of 3.0–19.99ng/ml in men aged 50–70 yr, repeat PSA within 7 wk allows more accurate risk prediction that may assist in the decision-making as to whether or not to proceed with prostate biopsy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.