Contrastive Analysis of Clinical Blood Transfusion Records Before and After Intervention

Abstract

Objective. To achieve better standardization in the writing of blood transfusion records and improve the safety of clinical blood transfusions by studying clinical blood transfusion records. Methods. Transfusion records were modified and interventional steps were taken, and final clinical transfusion records were randomly inspected. Results. Of a total of 1,280 transfusion records, 982 were qualified and 298 were unqualified, with 438 records qualified out of 640 transfusion records prior to intervention and 544 records qualified out of 640 transfusion records following the intervention; the pass level of the transfusion records increased from 68.44% to 85.00%. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the transfusion records prior to and following the intervention. Conclusion. Since the transfusion records were found to have varying degrees of imperfection and the indications for transfusion were not obvious, the hospital should enhance the training provided to medical staff on the transfusion-related laws and regulations, intensify the training to promote scientific and reasonable blood use, and standardize the writing of clinical medical records.