Abstract
PurposeArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) may help plants to overcome abiotic stresses, in part by improving their water uptake capacity. However how different AMF isolated from different climatic regions regulate plant abiotic stress tolerance and water uptake capacity is barely studied. The aim of this study was to reveal how three AMF isolated from two Mediterranean climate locations contrasting in annual precipitation, modify bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) root hydraulic properties facing drought and salinity.MethodsRhizophagus intraradices (Ri) and Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) were isolated from a humid area, whereas Claroideoglomus etunicatum (Ce) was isolated from a dry location. All plants (inoculated or not) were subjected to four days of withholding water or salt treatment. Root hydraulic properties including root hydraulic conductivity and aquaporin expression and abundance were determined.ResultsAll three AMF isolate induced significant differences in plant physiology regardless their different mycorrhizal colonization extent. Drought treatment diminished root hydraulic conductivity and only Fm inoculated plants featured measurable amount of sap exudate. After salt irrigation, AMF inoculation counterbalanced the drop of root hydraulic conductivity. In such situation two AMF, Fm and Ce, presented lowered phosphorylated (Ser-283) PIP2 AQP amount. AQP gene expression highlighted the importance of PvPIP1;2 and PvPIP2;3 plasticity in plants facing osmotic stress. After drought treatment AMF species from the humid location, Ri and Fm, improved plant water status and Fm enhanced root hydraulic conductivity, whereas all AMF performed similarly after salt irrigation, enhancing stomatal conductance and root hydraulic conductivity.ConclusionUnder drought conditions, the AMF isolates from humid regions were the ones that most effectively improved plant water relations. However, under salt stress, all three AMF isolates exhibited similar behavior. Therefore, to some extent, the climatic origin of the AMF could have influenced the response of host plants to drought stress, suggesting that those originating from dry areas may not necessarily be the most efficient.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
