Abstract

The distribution of a group of fish and macroinvertebrates (n = 52) resident in the US Northeast Shelf large marine ecosystem were characterized with species distribution models (SDM), which in turn were used to estimate occurrence and biomass center of gravity (COG). The SDMs were fit using random forest machine learning and were informed with a range of physical and biological variables. The estimated probability of occurrence and biomass from the models provided the weightings to determine depth, distance to the coast, and along‐shelf distance COG. The COGs of occupancy and biomass habitat tended to be separated by distances averaging 50 km, which approximates half of the minor axis of the subject ecosystem. During the study period (1978–2018), the biomass COG has tended to shift to further offshore positions whereas occupancy habitat has stayed at a regular spacing from the coastline. Both habitat types have shifted their along‐shelf distances, indicating a general movement to higher latitude or to the Northeast for this ecosystem. However, biomass tended to occur at lower latitudes in the spring and higher latitude in the fall in a response to seasonal conditions. Distribution of habitat in relation to depth reveals a divergence in response with occupancy habitat shallowing over time and biomass habitat distributing in progressively deeper water. These results suggest that climate forced change in distribution will differentially affect occurrence and biomass of marine taxa, which will likely affect the organization of ecosystems and the manner in which human populations utilize marine resources.

Highlights

  • It is understandable to assume an equivalence between the centers of distribution of where a species occurs versus where biomass is concentrated

  • The occurrence and biomass centers of distribution were distinct among fish and macroinvertebrates in the US Northeast Shelf large marine ecosystem

  • The two centers were separated by an average distance of around 50 km, which approximates the dimensions of the minor axis of the ecosystem

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

It is understandable to assume an equivalence between the centers of distribution of where a species occurs versus where biomass is concentrated. An extension of that approach has been to use observational data to develop species distribution models to advance inference on the distribution of habitat (Laman et al, 2018) This has taken the form of classification and regression models utilizing a range of mathematical forms that have the ability to capture the dynamics of distribution with inclusion of a range of dynamic predictor variables including physical and biological parameters (Robinson et al, 2017). The scientific surveys for this system have been comprehensive, which can be used to inform species distribution models (SDMs) for resident species at the microscale (Desprespatanjo et al, 1988) With these factors in mind, this study system should allow us to describe and differentiate centers of occurrence and biomass distribution with sufficient resolution to understand if and how they differ and what sort of change has occurred with centric distributions over time. The relationship between size and depth distribution for these species was analyzed

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call