Abstract

Despite significant progress in poverty measurement, few studies have undertaken an in-depth comparison of monetary and multidimensional measures in the context of low-income countries and fewer still in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet the differences can be particularly consequential in these settings. We address this gap by applying a distinct analytical strategy to the case of Rwanda. Using data from two waves of the Rwandan Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey, we combine comparing poverty rates cross-sectionally and over time, examining the overlaps and differences in the two measures, investigating poverty rates within population sub-groups, and estimating several statistical models to assess the differences between the two measures in identifying poverty risk factors. We find that using a monetary measure alone does not capture high incidence of multidimensional poverty in both waves, that it is possible to be multidimensional poor without being monetary poor, and that using a monetary measure alone overlooks significant change in multidimensional poverty over time. The two measures also differ in which poverty risk factors they put emphasis on. Relying only on monetary measures in low-income sub-Saharan Africa can send inaccurate signals to policymakers regarding the optimal design of social policies as well as monitoring their effectiveness.

Highlights

  • In 2013, 767 million people around the world were living on less than $1.90 a day (World Bank 2018)

  • Estimated monetary poverty rates appear lower than estimated multidimensional poverty rates

  • What do our findings imply for policy-makers and future research on poverty? Exclusively using monetary indicators for poverty measurement in the context of a low-income country like Rwanda has a serious risk of underestimating the multi-faceted poverty and its change over time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2013, 767 million people around the world were living on less than $1.90 a day (World Bank 2018). 100–150 million more people were suffering from chronic hunger or were not able to read and write. 200 million more people still had to practice open defecation (UNESCO Institute for Statistics 2013, 2015; FAO 2013; WHO and UNICEF 2018). How many people should be considered poor?. An income of US$1.90 a day represents the World Bank’s global poverty line. By this metric, ‘only’ 767 million people were considered poor in 2013. Other measures indicate that significantly more than 767 million people were severely deprived in education, health, and standards of living. Few would argue that these deprivations are not signs of being poor, but the threshold of US$1.90 per day does not adequately account for them

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call