Abstract

Summary Plants allocate resources to processes related to growth and enemy defence. Simultaneously, they interact with complex soil microbiomes that also affect plant performance. While the influence of individual microbial groups on single plants is increasingly studied, effects of microbial interactions on growth, defence and growth–defence relationships remain unknown, especially at the plant community level.We investigated how three microbial groups (bacteria, fungi, protists), alone and in full‐factorial combinations, affect plant performance and potential growth–defence relationships by measuring phenolics composition in early‐ and mid‐successional grass and forb communities in a glasshouse experiment.Microbial groups did not affect plant growth and only fungi increased defence compounds in early‐ and mid‐successional forbs, while grasses were not affected. Shoot biomass–defence relationships were negatively correlated in most microbial treatments in early‐successional forbs, but positively in several microbial treatments in mid‐successional forbs. The growth–defence relationship was generally negative in early‐successional but not in mid‐successional grasses. The presence of different microbiomes commonly removed the observed growth–defence relationships.We conclude that soil microorganisms and their interactions can shift growth–defence relationships differentially for plant functional groups and the relationships vary between successional stages. Microbial interaction‐induced growth–defence shifts might therefore underlie distinct plant strategies and fitness.

Highlights

  • Plant species differ profoundly in how much energy they allocate to their vegetative and reproductive growth compared with their defence against natural enemies (Coley et al, 1985; Coley, 1988; Herms & Mattson, 1992)

  • Microbial treatments and successional type interacted in affecting the shoot : root ratio of grass communities (F = 2.19, P = 0.04; Table 2; Fig. 2c), potentially driven by an increased shoot : root ratio in early successional communities in bacterial-only and bacterial–fungal mixed treatments

  • We found no effects of microbial treatments or interaction with plant succession

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plant species differ profoundly in how much energy they allocate to their vegetative and reproductive growth compared with their defence against natural enemies (Coley et al, 1985; Coley, 1988; Herms & Mattson, 1992). Plant growth and abundance are often driven by nutrient availability and the balance between their antagonists and mutualists in the environment (Huot et al, 2014; Smakowska et al, 2016). The variation in plant adaptations that are depending on nutrient availability and the biotic environment determines the composition and dynamics of plant communities (Olff & Ritchie, 1998; HilleRisLambers et al, 2012). Over time and following the depletion of previously amended nutrients, these plants are gradually replaced by mid- or late-successional plant species (Tilman, 1985; Walker et al, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call