Contrasting effects of nifedipine and verapamil on myocardium and vascular smooth muscle at two levels of coronary occlusion in the dog

Abstract

The calcium flux inhibitors nifedipine and verapamill have recently been used in the setting of both classical Heberden's and variant angina. It has also been suggested that these agents may preserve function and viability of threatened myocardium. The effects of these agents on the relationship between myocardial blood flow and contraction in the setting of partial coronary occlusion is unknown. Thus 39 open-chest dogs underwent partial coronary occlusion to diastolic perfusion pressures of 25 or 40 mm Hg. The dogs then received intracoronary infusions of 10 μg nifedipine or 100 μg verapamil. Myocardial blood flow was measured with tracer microspheres and myocardial shortening was assessed with ultrasonic crystals. At 25 mm Hg nifedipine improved myocardial shortening while blood flow did not change. In contrast, verapamil caused shortening to be abolished but also did not change blood flow. At 40 mm Hg nifedipine, while not affecting shortening, caused a “redistribution” of blood flow from endocardium; in contrast, verapamil again caused shortening to be abolished, but only increased epicardial blood flow leaving endocardial flow intact. Thus verapamil and nifedipine have differing effects. Nifedipine is a potent vasodilator at doses having no negative inotropic effects. In addition, nifedipine can cause a transmural “redistribution” of blood flow from endocardium to epicardium. In contrast, verapamil is also a potent vasodilator, but has profound negative inotropic effects.