Abstract
AbstractAimTo explore how a highly invasive plant species (Buddleja davidii Franch.), managed honeybees and flower diversity affected plant–flower visitor interactions over the whole elevational range distribution of the exotic plant.LocationItalian Alps.MethodsWe selected nine pairs of sites (one invaded and one non‐invaded by B. davidii) across gradients in honeybee abundance and diversity of flower resources. We observed plant–flower visitor interactions every three weeks, for a total of five surveys covering the full flowering season of B. davidii (June–August). We tested how B. davidii, honeybee abundance and flowering plant diversity affected network robustness, overlap in flower resource use of wild flower visitors with honeybees and flower visitor specialization. We also tested for an interaction between B. davidii presence and honeybee abundance, and tested whether the effects of the two variables changed among insect orders.ResultsBuddleja davidii and honeybees had contrasting effects on network robustness and on several species‐level metrics. Network robustness increased with increasing honeybee abundance and flower diversity. Increasing honeybee abundance generally increased specialization of lepidopterans and dipterans that tended to switch to less visited plant species, possibly in order to avoid competition. Specialization of flower visitors declined in sites invaded by B. davidii, indicating that the invasive plant attracted pollinators, which in turn also visited co‐occurring species in the neighbourhood.Main conclusionsAlthough increasing honeybee abundance was associated with higher network stability, it also modified plant–flower visitor interactions by forcing species to shift their diet irrespective of floral diversity. The effect was particularly strong for non‐bee flower visitors. The consequences of these changes in plant–flower visitor interactions for the reproductive success of flowering plants are still largely unknown.
Highlights
Mountain ecosystems are considered biodiversity hotspots characterized by a high number of rare and endemic species
The three specialization metrics were strongly correlated with those calculated with the honeybee in the network, so we present and discuss only the values calculated including the honeybee within the network
We found no interaction between B. davidii and honeybee abundance on both network- and species-level metrics
Summary
Mountain ecosystems are considered biodiversity hotspots characterized by a high number of rare and endemic species. Invasions of mass-flowering plants can have positive, long-term effects on pollinator population dynamics by complementing nectar and pollen resources provided by native plants (Albrecht, Ramis, & Traveset, 2016; Davis, Kelly, Maggs, & Stout, 2018; Giovanetti, Ramos, & Máguas, 2018; Russo et al, 2016; Stout & Tiedeken, 2017) Despite this variability, most of the available research has focused on analysing changes in plant–pollinator interactions in invaded vs uninvaded plant communities without considering potential interactions between exotic plant invasion and other abiotic and biotic drivers of environmental change (González-Varo et al, 2013, but see Grass et al, 2013). The honeybee is expected to modify the interactions between wild pollinators and plants, increasing potential competition in terms of resource overlap, and so forcing species to switch to less rewarding resources (Hung, Kingston, Lee, Holway, & Kohn, 2019)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.