Abstract

Abstract. The United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosols (UKCA) chemistry–climate model is used to quantify the differences in chemical environment for surface O3 for six major industrial regions across China in summer 2016. We first enhance the UKCA gas-phase chemistry scheme by incorporating reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) tracers that are necessary to represent urban and regional-scale O3 photochemistry. We demonstrate that the model with the improved chemistry scheme captures the observed magnitudes and diurnal patterns of surface O3 concentrations across these regions well. Simulated O3 concentrations are highest in Beijing and Shijiazhuang on the North China Plain and in Chongqing, lower in Shanghai and Nanjing in the Yangtze River Delta, and lowest in Guangzhou in the Pearl River Delta despite the highest daytime O3 production rates in Guangzhou. NOx / VOC and H2O2 / HNO3 ratios indicate that O3 production across all regions except Chongqing is VOC limited. We confirm this by constructing O3 response surfaces for each region changing NOx and VOC emissions and further contrast the effectiveness of measures to reduce surface O3 concentrations. In VOC-limited regions, reducing NOx emissions by 20 % leads to a substantial O3 increase (11 %) in Shanghai. We find that reductions in NOx emissions alone of more than 70 % are required to decrease O3 concentrations across all regions. Reductions in VOC emissions alone of 20 % produce the largest decrease (−11 %) in O3 levels in Shanghai and Guangzhou and the smallest decrease (−1 %) in Chongqing. These responses are substantially different from those currently found in highly populated regions in other parts of the world, likely due to higher NOx emission levels in these Chinese regions. Our work provides an assessment of the effectiveness of emission control strategies to mitigate surface O3 pollution in these major industrial regions and emphasises that combined NOx and VOC emission controls play a pivotal role in effectively offsetting high O3 levels. It also demonstrates new capabilities in capturing regional air pollution that will permit this model to be used for future studies of regional air-quality–climate interactions.

Highlights

  • Surface ozone (O3) has become the main cause of atmospheric pollution in the summertime in China since 2013 and is severe in industrial areas of China such as the North China Plain (NCP), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), the Pearl River Delta (PRD) and the Sichuan Basin where precursor emissions are high (Li et al, 2019a)

  • In a volatile organic compound (VOC)-limited regime, O3 levels may increase with decreasing NOx emissions, which is common in urban areas with high NOx emissions, and this is reflected in high NOx / VOC or low H2O2 / HNO3 ratios

  • This study presents the application of the global chemistry– climate United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosols (UKCA) model with an improved gas-phase chemistry scheme including more reactive VOCs to simulate regional summertime O3 pollution across major industrialised regions in China for the first time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Surface ozone (O3) has become the main cause of atmospheric pollution in the summertime in China since 2013 and is severe in industrial areas of China such as the North China Plain (NCP), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), the Pearl River Delta (PRD) and the Sichuan Basin where precursor emissions are high (Li et al, 2019a). In a VOC-limited regime, O3 levels may increase with decreasing NOx emissions, which is common in urban areas with high NOx emissions, and this is reflected in high NOx / VOC or low H2O2 / HNO3 ratios Critical values of these indicators of O3 sensitivity vary by region and by season (Sillman, 1995; Liu et al, 2010; Xing et al, 2019). We use O3 sensitivity indicators to compare and contrast the chemical oxidative environment across these different regions in China to identify emission control measures that would be most beneficial to reduce O3 pollution levels.

Materials and methods
Emissions
Selected regions and observations
Model evaluation of surface O3 and NO2
Differences in chemical environment
Differences in local O3 production rates
Response of O3 to emission controls
Effectiveness of emission controls in reducing surface O3 levels
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call