Abstract
Background Characterizing myocardial infarctions (MIs) on the basis of LGE CMR requires gadolinium infusion, which poses limitations in certain patient populations and imaging workflow. We hypothesized that T1 differences between MI and remote territories at 3T would enable reliable characterization of chronic MI. Methods Canines (n = 29) underwent CMR at 7 days (acute) and 4 months (chronic) following reperfused MIs at 3T (n = 19) and 1.5T (n = 10). Contrast-free T1 maps (MOLLI; 8 TIs with 2 inversion blocks of 3+5 images; minimum TI = 110 ms; ΔTI = 80 ms; TR/TE = 2.2/1.1 ms) and LGE images (IR-prepared FLASH; TI optimized to null remote myocardium; TR/TE = 3.5/1.75 ms) were acquired. MI location, size and transmurality were determined using Mean+5SD criterion relative to remote myocardium. T2 maps (T2-prepared SSFP; T2 preparation times = 0, 24 and 55 ms; TR/TE = 2.8/1.4 ms) were acquired to compare acute and chronic MIs. Commonly used imaging parameters were slice thickness = 6 mm and spatial resolution = 1.3 × 1.3 mm 2. Histological validation was sought to confirm the presence of replacement fibrosis within the chronic infarct zones. Results Contrast-free T1 maps and LGE images of a representative mid-ventricular slice, along with AHA 17-segment bulls-eye plots depicting the MI size and transmurality acquired from a canine scanned imaged 4 months post-MI at 3T are shown in Figure 1. Bland-Altman plots, linear regression plots and receiver-operating characteristic curve comparing T1 maps and LGE images for measuring infarct volume (IV, %LV) and transmurality (IT) in the chronic phase at 3T are also shown. At 3T, T1 maps and LGE images were not different for measuring IV (5.6 ± 3.7% vs. 5.5 ± 3.7%; p = 0.61) and IT (44 ± 15% vs. 46 ± 15%; p = 0.81) in the chronic phase, but were significantly different in the acute phase (IS: 13.3 ± 8.4% vs. 11.6 ± 6.8%, p = 0.007 and IT: 64 ± 19% vs. 56 ± 17%, p = 0.007). At 1.5T, IV and IT were significantly underestimated by T1 maps relative to LGE images during acute (IS: 9.4 ± 5.6% vs. 15.5 ± 9.4%, p < 0.001 and IT: 59 ± 5% vs. 76 ± 6%, p < 0.001) and chronic phases (IS: 2.1 ± 1.2% vs. 4.8 ± 1.8%, p < 0.001 and IT: 47 ± 7% vs. 66 ± 9%, p < 0.001). At 3T and 1.5T, T1 values of the MI remained elevated in both acute (3T: p < 0.001; 1.5T: p < 0.001) and chronic phases (3T: p < 0.001; 1.5T: p = 0.037) compared to remote myocardium (Table 1). At both 3T and 1.5T, relative to the remote myocardium, T2 values of the MI were elevated in the acute phase (p < 0.001 for both cases), but were not different in the chronic phase (3T: p = 0.19, 1.5T: p = 0.55). Ex-vivo TTC and Elastinmodified Masson’s Trichrome (EMT) stainings (Figure 1) confirmed extensive replacement fibrosis within the MI territories at 4 months post MI. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-free T1 maps at 3T for detecting chronic MIs were 95% and 97%, respectively. Conclusions Contrast-free T1 maps at 3T can determine the location, size and transmurality of chronic MIs with high diagnostic accuracy.
Highlights
Characterizing myocardial infarctions (MIs) on the basis of LGE CMR requires gadolinium infusion, which poses limitations in certain patient populations and imaging workflow
Contrast-free T1 maps (MOLLI; 8 TIs with 2 inversion blocks of 3+5 images; minimum TI = 110 ms; ΔTI = 80 ms; TR/TE = 2.2/1.1 ms) and LGE images (IR-prepared FLASH; TI optimized to null remote myocardium; TR/TE = 3.5/1.75 ms) were acquired
Contrast-free T1 maps and LGE images of a representative mid-ventricular slice, along with AHA 17-segment bulls-eye plots depicting the MI size and transmurality acquired from a canine scanned imaged 4 months
Summary
Characterizing myocardial infarctions (MIs) on the basis of LGE CMR requires gadolinium infusion, which poses limitations in certain patient populations and imaging workflow. Contrast-free T1 mapping at 3T can characterize chronic myocardial infarctions with high diagnostic accuracy
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.