Abstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), performed immediately after percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) or radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA), by comparing results with the computed tomography (CT) follow-up. Sixty-nine consecutive patients with a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent PEI or RFTA. After treatment, three CEUS enhancement patterns were observed: isovascular, hypovascular and avascular, which were compared with the CT findings. Sensitivity of the avascular pattern at CEUS and effectiveness of the ablative procedures were evaluated and compared with the chi-square test. Ninety hypervascular HCCs, with a mean diameter of 2.6 cm (0.5-4.9 cm), underwent PEI (n=54) and RFTA (n=36). In the first group, CT identified complete necrosis in 28/54 (52%) lesions, 21 (75%) of which had avascular, one (4%) isovascular and six (21%) hypovascular patterns at CEUS. In the second group, CT showed complete necrosis in 31/36 (86%) lesions, all (100%) of which had a corresponding avascular pattern at CEUS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the avascular pattern at CEUS compared with CT findings were 75%, 69%, 72%, 72% and 72% for PEI and 100%, 20%, 89%, 100% and 89%, for RFTA, respectively. A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the sensitivity of CEUS after PEI and after RFTA and between the necrosis obtained by RFTA and PEI were observed. CEUS performed immediately after percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma to evaluate treatment efficacy is compulsory in the case of RFTA but not for PEI.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.