Abstract

Small bowel obstruction is a common cause of acute abdominal distress, accounting for up to 20% of emergency admissions to surgical services. Although the majority of obstructions will resolve with conservative therapy alone, there are currently no reliable tests for identifying the patients who will require operation. Barium contrast studies have the potential to rapidly identify patients with complete small bowel obstruction, but many surgeons are hesitant to use them for fear of inducing complications. We report the results of a randomized, prospective trial comparing immediate oral barium contrast studies with plain abdominal X-rays in patients presenting with signs and symptoms of small bowel obstruction. End points included time to resolution of the symptoms or operation, total number of hospital days, and morbidity. Sixty-four patients completed the study; of these, 23 received contrast studies and 41 had plain radiographs only. Six of the contrast group (26%) and 11 of the plain radiograph group (27%) ultimately went to operation. Barium contrast studies had a sensitivity of 100% for diagnosing complete obstruction, whereas the sensitivity of serial plain radiographs was only 82%. Among those going to operation, the time from admission to operation was 8.2 hours in the contrast group and 12.4 hours in the plain radiograph group, but this result did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.25). Total hospital days were similar between the two groups (8 vs. 12 days, p = 0.40). There were no complications resulting from the oral administration of barium. Small bowel contrast studies using barium are safe and may shorten the time to operation in patients presenting with signs and symptoms of small bowel obstruction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call