Abstract

BackgroundCoronary revascularization using imaging guidance is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contrast dye to achieve the required blood clearance during acquisition. We sought to systematically evaluate the technical performance of saline as an alternative to iodinated contrast for intravascular optical coherence tomography assessment.Methods and resultsWe performed bench top optical coherence tomography analysis on nylon tubing with sequential contrast/saline dilutions to empirically derive adjustment coefficients. We then applied these coefficients in vivo in an established rabbit abdominal stenting model with both saline and contrast optical coherence tomography imaging. In this model, we assessed the impact of saline on both quantitative and qualitative vessel assessment. Nylon tubing assessment demonstrated a linear relationship between saline and contrast for both area and diameter. We then derived adjustment coefficients, allowing for accurate calculation of area and diameter when converting saline into both contrast and reference dimensions. In vivo studies confirmed reduced area with saline versus contrast [7.43 (5.67–8.36) mm2 versus 8.2 (6.34–9.39) mm2, p = 0.001] and diameter [3.08 mm versus 3.23 mm, p = 0.001]. Following correction, a strong relationship was achieved in vivo between saline and contrast in both area and diameter without compromising image quality, artefact, or strut assessment.ConclusionSaline generates reduced dimensions compared to contrast during intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging. The relationship across physiologic coronary diameters is linear and can be corrected with high fidelity. Saline does not adversely impact image quality, artefact, or strut assessment.

Highlights

  • Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are predominantly performed based on fluoroscopic and cineangiographic images for determining vessel pathology and sizing

  • Coronary assessment has greatly improved with the advent of intravascular imaging modalities– intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT)

  • Nylon tubing was assessed with varying concentrations of saline/contrast and the generated areas and diameters were plotted as a function of the known reference area and diameters of the tubing, demonstrating a linear relationship across all dilutions (Fig 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are predominantly performed based on fluoroscopic and cineangiographic images for determining vessel pathology and sizing. Coronary assessment has greatly improved with the advent of intravascular imaging modalities– intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT uses near-infrared light (wavelength ~1300nm) to generate tomographic images with histological-grade resolution (10-20um). This enhanced resolution enables OCT to provide detailed intravascular assessment for thrombus, plaque morphology, intimal lesions (neointima, dissection) and stent evaluation (apposition, sizing, coverage) [1]. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contrast dye to achieve the required blood clearance during acquisition. We sought to systematically evaluate the technical performance of saline as an alternative to iodinated contrast for intravascular optical coherence tomography assessment

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call