Abstract

Purpose:To assess the probability of achieving optimal contrast enhancement in 100 kVp and 120 kVp-protocol on hepatic computed tomography (CT) scans.Materials and methods:We enrolled 200 patients in a retrospective cohort study. Hundred patients were scanned with 120 kVp setting, and other 100 patients were scanned with 100 kVp setting. We measured the CT number in the abdominal aorta and hepatic parenchyma on unenhanced scans and hepatic arterial phase (HAP)-, and portal venous phase (PVP). The aortic enhancement at HAP and the hepatic parenchymal enhancement at PVP were compared between the two scanning protocols. Bayesian inference was used to assess the probability of achieving optimal contrast enhancement in each protocol.Results:The Bayesian analysis indicated that when 100 kVp-rotocol was used, the probability of achieving optimal aortic enhancement (>280 HU) was 98.8% ± 0.6%, whereas it was 88.7% ± 2.5% when 120 kVp-protocol was used. Also, the probability of achieving optimal hepatic parenchymal enhancement (>50 HU) was 95.3% ± 1.5%, whereas it was 64.7% ± 3.8% when 120 kVp-protocol was used.Conclusion:Bayesian inference suggested that the post-test probability of optimal contrast enhancement at hepatic dynamic CT was lower under the 120 kVp than the 100 kVp-protocol

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call