Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with standard B-mode ultrasound (US) for diagnosis of splenic lymphoma involvement. Methods From 04/2005 to 10/2008 n = 250 lymphoma patients were investigated by standard B-mode US. A homogeneous splenic echotexture was found in 199 patients (79%). To clarify the benefit of CEUS in this group a pilot series was performed with 16 of the 199 lymphoma patients. All patients with an abnormal splenic echotexture on standard B-Mode US ( n = 51) including focal hypoechoic splenic lesions ( n = 41) and an inhomogeneous splenic texture ( n = 10) were studied by CEUS. CEUS data were retrospectively evaluated. The diagnoses included indolent lymphoma ( n = 27), aggressive lymphoma ( n = 14), and Hodgkin's disease ( n = 10). Number and size of lesions were determined by B-mode US and CEUS. The visualisation of splenic lymphoma involvement by CEUS in comparison to B-mode US was classified as worse, equal, or better. Results All patients with a homogeneous spleen on B-mode US ( n = 16) had no visible focal lesions on CEUS. Study patients with focal lesions ( n = 41) had a hypoechoic ( n = 22) or isoechoic ( n = 19) enhancement during the arterial phase, and a hypoechoic enhancement during the parenchymal phase ( n = 41). The visualisation of focal splenic lymphoma was equal ( n = 32), better ( n = 6), or worse ( n = 3). In all study patients with an inhomogeneous spleen on B-mode US ( n = 10) no focal lesions were found by CEUS and the value of CEUS therefore was classified as worse. Conclusion CEUS has no clear advantage for diagnosis of splenic lymphoma involvement.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call