Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Contrast-associated nephropathy (CAN) is an extensively studied but equally controversial sequela of intravascular contrast use. Despite this, there is still significant debate about its definition and thus incidence, the impact of route of contrast administration, and ultimately, what constitutes appropriate clinical practice in light of risks. While guidelines cannot replace clinical judgment, without consensus either enthusiastic withholding of contrast from necessary procedures or its administration despite increased risk may be deleterious to patient outcomes. This article reviews current literature on route-dependent risk and other interplaying factors impacting incidence of CAN. .
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
