Abstract

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) and visual imagery have been shown to modulate visual perception. However, how the subjective experience of VSTM/imagery and its contrast modulate this process has not been investigated. We addressed this issue by asking participants to detect brief masked targets while they were engaged either in VSTM or visual imagery. Subjective experience of memory/imagery (strength scale), and the visual contrast of the memory/mental image (contrast scale) were assessed on a trial-by-trial basis. For both VSTM and imagery, contrast of the memory/mental image was positively associated with reporting target presence. Consequently, at the sensory level, both VSTM and imagery facilitated visual perception. However, subjective strength of VSTM was positively associated with visual detection whereas the opposite pattern was found for imagery. Thus the relationship between subjective strength of memory/imagery and visual detection are qualitatively different for VSTM and visual imagery, although their impact at the sensory level appears similar. Our results furthermore demonstrate that imagery and VSTM are partly dissociable processes.

Highlights

  • Visual short-term memory (VSTM) and visual imagery are believed to involve the same mechanisms in the visual system that encode incoming visual information (e.g. 1-6)

  • Subjective strength of VSTM was positively associated with visual detection whereas the opposite pattern was found for imagery

  • The ANOVA revealed no significant effect of VSTM/imagery on detection, an uncorrected pairwise comparison suggests a weak facilitation for VSTM (t(13) =-2.30; p=0.04)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) and visual imagery are believed to involve the same mechanisms in the visual system that encode incoming visual information (e.g. 1-6). The Perky effect, which occurs when the mental image and the visual target spatially overlap, has been explained in terms of imagery reducing target energy in the region of the visual field in which the image is located [8] In this view, the interference occurs at early levels of visual processing. The disruptive effect of imagery on vision has been proposed to reflect competition for a limited pool of resources to be shared between visual processing and the maintenance of the mental image (e.g. 10) Both perceptual and attentional mechanisms may account for these effects. Engagement in VSTM decreases reaction times to features of visual targets that are congruent with VSTM content [13] This facilitation has been explained in terms of VSTM boosting visual processing by enhancing the baseline activation level of early perceptual representations (see e.g. 12,13)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call