Contract-relax technique compared to static stretching in treating migraine in women: A randomized pilot trial

Abstract

IntroductionPhysical therapy is often used by patients with headache, including modalities such as muscle stretching exercises. ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of a pilot trial aimed at determining the efficacy of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contract-relax technique compared to static stretching for treating migraineurs. MethodsThis pilot trial allocated 30 migraineur women (23 ± 4 years) into PNF (n = 15) and static stretching groups (n = 15). The interventions were performed twice a week (16 sessions, 8 weeks). The feasibility outcomes included successful random allocation of 30 patients during a 12-month period, the proportion of eligible patients randomly assigned to each group, and the proportion of those who completed the 30-day follow-up. The outcomes of headache characteristics; medication intake; severity of migraine-related disability; neck disability; cervical mobility; pressure pain threshold; adverse effects and global perception of change were evaluated at baseline, after the end of treatment and after 30-day follow-up. ResultsThe recruitment rate was 4.66% participants/month. The proportion of eligible patients randomly assigned to each group and for those who completed the 30-day follow-up was 88.23% and 100%, respectively. Both groups improved in headache-related outcomes. The perception of change was important for 67% of the PNF group and 47% of the static stretching group. No differences were found between groups regarding the studied outcomes. ConclusionThis is a feasible pilot trial. The PNF contract-relax technique was no more effective than static stretching for treating migraine, but both techniques improved the headache, the severity of migraine-related disability and the satisfaction after treatment.